Why Write a Squid Game Essay

How Can I Get Essay For Free and Is it realistic to expect a low-cost, High-Quality Essay from a Cheap Paper Writing Service?

Suppose you are a frequent essay writer or have a deep interest in writing essays on interesting topics, particularly topics focused on arguments. In that case, you should certainly write an essay on the well-known series “Squid Game,” available on Netflix.

Why do we recommend that you write an essay about the Squid Game right now? Let’s understand why this subject matter will make for a fascinating argumentative essay.

What is an Argumentative Essay?

As an academic writer, the argumentative essay expects students to research, gather and assess evidence, and take a clear stance on a contentious issue.

Students writing argumentative essays must delve deeply into relevant literature or published works whenever possible. Students may need to conduct interviews, surveys, observations, and experiments to gather data for their argumentative essays. In-depth research provides the student with the knowledge necessary to understand the topic at hand and the context within which to evaluate the various perspectives before allowing the student to settle on a stance and provide evidence in support of it. Argumentative essays require a clear thesis and consistent reasoning, regardless of the depth or breadth of the research conducted.

The Step-by-Step Guide to Outlining an Argumentative Essay on Squid Game

Argumentative essays must have a basic format, making it simple for readers to follow along with what is going on in the paper. The purpose of an argumentative essay is to present one’s viewpoint, together with supporting facts and reasoning, in an organized fashion. This is the format that a good argumentative essay should adhere to:

1. The Introduction: In the opening paragraph of your essay, you should provide some background information required to comprehend your argument, outline the evidence you will present, and establish your thesis. Additionally, you should provide an overview of the issue. Regarding your topic chosen for the series Squid Game, you can write an introduction to what you will discuss in your essay and what your argument is about.

2. The statement of the Thesis: This is a portion of the first paragraph that you have. It is a condensed version of your key point and assertion that is only one phrase long. Your thesis statement for the Squid Game essay should reflect a concise statement regarding your argument.

3. Body Content:  The conventional format for an argumentative essay consists of at least three paragraphs that explain why the writer supports their thesis. Each sentence in the body paragraphs should be organized around a topic sentence that provides a clear and succinct explanation of why the reader should agree with your argument. The topic sentence should address a distinct notion or piece of evidence. In the body paragraphs of your essay, you should provide evidence for your views by citing studies, research, statistics, and specific examples. Discuss the contrasting viewpoints and either demonstrate why they are incorrect or explain why you disagree with them. The presentation of facts and careful consideration of a subject from all possible perspectives can help you build credibility and earn the reader’s trust.

In your argumentative essay on Squid Game, you should use all necessary evidence, research, and supporting facts to support your thesis statement. This may include reviews from renowned platforms, public data available & other possible necessary details on the actors, story, or cinematography.

4. Conclusion: The bottom line is one paragraph that restates your thesis statement and summarizes all of the arguments stated in the other paragraphs of your body. A strong conclusion will appeal to the reader’s feelings rather than presenting brand-fresh evidence or additional points of contention. Anecdotes from the author’s own life are sometimes used to illustrate how the subject matter resonates with them on a personal level when writing about it.

Conclude your argumentative essay with a brief recap of your thesis statement and how your research has proved your argument & if available, a thought to ponder for your readers.

How to approach your argument while writing an Argumentative Essay?

The approach you take in an argumentative essay needs to be objective; the foundation of your arguments ought to be logic and evidence, and not an exaggeration or appeals to the reader’s emotions.

There are a variety of alternative ways that can be taken while writing argumentative essays; nevertheless, two typical models can assist you in the beginning to outline your arguments. These models are the Toulmin model and the Rogerian model.

The Toulmin Approach

The Toulmin model is comprised of four stages, each of which can be performed an unlimited number of times depending on the requirements of the argument:

• Make a claim
• Give the justifications (pieces of evidence) supporting the claim.
• Give an account of the basis (how the grounds support the claim)
• Discuss potential rebuttals to the claim, pointing out the deficiencies in the argument and demonstrating that you have considered various other points of view.

Approaches similar to the Toulmin paradigm are frequently found in academic essays. In an argumentative essay, it is extremely important to make a clear relationship between your assertions and the evidence that supports them; however, you do not need to employ the particular terms “grounds,” “warrants,” or “rebuttals” to do so.

Imagine that you are engaged in a debate on the viability of anti-discrimination policies in the workplace. It’s possible:

• Argue that training for unconscious bias does not produce the desired benefits and that the resources would be better spent on other approaches.
• Cite data to support your assertion
• Please explain how the evidence demonstrates that the approach is ineffective.
• Anticipate that your claim may be challenged based on other evidence, and indicate whether or not these challenges have merit and the reasons for challenging your claim if they do not.

The Rogerian Approach

In addition, the Rogerian model consists of four steps, which you should try to incorporate multiple times throughout your essay:

• Discuss the aspects of the opposing position that are sound and the possible motivations behind people holding it.
• Bring to light the challenges that come with holding this job.
• Put up your position and demonstrate how it offers solutions to the issues presented.
• Propose a potential middle ground: in what aspects of your stance would advocates for the opposing stance be better off embracing your position?

This model assembles an accurate image of both sides of an argument and then searches for a solution that satisfies everyone. It is especially helpful in situations where individuals tend to strongly disagree with one another on the matter being addressed since it enables you to approach opposing arguments in good faith.

Take, for example, the position that you want to argue that the internet has positively impacted education. You could try the following:

Recognize the extent to which students rely on online resources such as Wikipedia.

You may argue that instructors regard Wikipedia as less reliable than it is.

Introduce the concept that students can genuinely learn about referring using Wikipedia’s citation system.

For instructors who are doubtful about the efficacy of Wikipedia, a suitable assignment could be to participate in critical engagement with the website.

You don’t need to choose just one of these models; you may employ aspects of both models in various parts of your essay, but it is important to consider these models if you need help organizing your ideas.

What would make a strong argument about Squid Game?

While each individual may have a different approach or opinion about the famous Netflix Series, one of the most interesting arguments is how Squid Game depicts the Socioeconomic disbalance in South Korea.

The Squid Game as a Metaphor for Economic Disparity

Squid Game, a South Korean survival drama released by Netflix on September 17, 2021, has swept the world. Squid Game became Netflix’s greatest launch, with over 111 million views in the previous month, despite being an improbable smash owing to being repeatedly rejected by many production firms before being picked up by Netflix. The avalanche of memes created by the public and the media coverage is given further attest to its widespread appeal. Squid Game is a hit but has yet to be without its detractors. Both fans and reviewers have voiced their displeasure with the show’s violent depictions of violence. For example, the New York Times called the violence “more than slightly disturbing in its enormity” and wrote that the program was “simply empty, bloody calories” (Hale). True, the series has gore that would make even a die-hard lover of the slasher subgenre wince, but to dismiss it entirely based on that is a simplification. The series’ substance cannot be understood in isolation from its historical and cultural setting, which must be considered in any analysis or interpretation. The context is the very thing that unlocks the message’s meaning. Put in the backdrop of the personal debt crisis in South Korea, Squid Game becomes a metaphor for the widening gap between the haves and have-nots across the industrialized world.

One must be familiar with the historical and cultural milieu in which Squid Game is set to grasp the metaphor it presents of economic and social stratification. One of the primary themes in Squid Game is the impact of the South Korean financial problem on the country’s culture. The show chronicles the lives of 456 people as they participate in six games designed for children that end in violent deaths. These people all had similar histories, culminating in them agreeing to play violent games for the chance to earn 45 billion ($38 million) while in debt and being pursued by vicious creditors. Gi-hun, the primary character, was laid off from a factory and has struggled ever since; Sae-book is a North Korean defector who a broker duped; and Ali is a migrant worker whose employer refused to pay. While some of the players’ debts are the result of their actions, such as the instance of a gangster who collected debt through gambling, the majority of the players are in debt because of circumstances beyond their control. These people’s plights are based on real-life socioeconomic concerns in Korea, especially the widespread problem of personal debt.

How to address this Socioeconomic Disbalance in your Essay’s Body Content?

Individuals at the very top significantly impact the lives of those who make up the working class in industrialized countries. Although the industrialized world is renowned for its high level of life, it is also beset by rising poverty rates and a widening wage gap. These two factors are the primary contributors to inequality that arise directly from the choices made by the elite. Take, for example, the calculations made by Oxfam, which show that the wealthiest 1% of the world’s population own more money than the remaining 99% of the population combined. In point of fact, the combined wealth of the top 62 richest persons in the world is greater than that of the bottom half of the world’s population (British Broadcasting Corporation). However, such power is not only expressed in numbers; it is also manifested in the lives of regular individuals worldwide. The choices that multinational corporations make have an effect on the lives of millions of people. The fact that such businesses are owned by some of the wealthiest people in the world stands in stark contrast to the fact that many of their employees live in abject poverty. And even though these businesses have a track record of engaging in unethical business practices, they continue attracting many employees.

The lack of available alternatives leaves many people with no choice except to put up with being exploited. These kinds of businesses are aware that they do not need to make significant adjustments to what they do since they are also aware that consumers prefer to have something rather than nothing. People who are penniless are exactly the type of workers that these kinds of businesses prey on. Therefore, abuse is not made possible by free choice; rather, it is made possible by the desperation bred by the wealthy’s excesses. Another degree of connection may be found between actual life and Squid Game in the form of the power imbalance that exists between corporations and labor. In the same way that the game organizers argue that the participants are not forced into playing and that they choose to participate of their own free will, predatory firms insist that they do not force employees while neglecting the power dynamics that prolong the cycle of exploitation. “Squid Game is a shocking condemnation of capitalism and mercantilism, of the contradictory politics of despair and power,” Cho writes in her review for The Harvard Crimson. It is a warning of the moral, psychological, and social disintegration that begins the instant we cease seeing our fellow humans in that light. In the same way, the players in the series are treated as nothing more than pawns, and many businesses view their employees as throwaway gears in a profitable machine because of their ability to be replaced.

It is also important to note that Squid Game adheres to the literary and cinematic history of using depictions of violence to make a point about inequity. This is something that should really be mentioned. The South Korea series is by no means the pioneer in carrying out this particular endeavor. Both of these two examples could be more graphic. The novel Battle Royale by Koushun Takami and the young adult novel series The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins are two key works that the program either directly or indirectly takes from or, at the very least, resembles. Much like Squid Game, these works contain lethal tournaments conceived by the wealthy and played by the less fortunate. Both of these works have been criticized for the amount of violence they include, but they have also garnered praise for the profound way they depict the disparities in social status.

A reasonable conclusion to your essay on Squid Game?

At the end of the day, a reasonable argument may be made that the depiction of violence in Squid Game is overly graphic. The allegation that this series’s violence is pointless and devoid of deeper significance cannot be leveled against it. On the contrary, the violence in Squid Game is intended to be interpreted as an allegory for the socioeconomic disparity in the developed world. When placed against South Korea’s debt problem, the series is a mirror of an advanced economy that has disregarded those at the bottom of the economic ladder. In addition to this, each episode serves as a commentary on the unequal distribution of wealth across the industrialized world. In the same way that the wealthy game organizers get to choose who survives and who dies in the series, wealthy corporations in the real world have the power to make decisions that determine the fate of the less fortunate. According to Cho’s insightful observation, “for many shows, violence is a gimmick. The goal of “Squid Game” is to engage in violent acts.

Please let us know if you find the information and research shown in the sample useful. If you need assistance writing an in-depth essay on Squid Game from a different perspective, Essay Basics is here for you any time, any day. Let’s discuss your next great argumentative essay with us.