Bad Impacts of Censorship
Human beings have basic rights and freedoms that are guaranteed in the constitution, but governments have occasionally used different means to censor these rights. Censorship has negative repercussions since they tend to adversely affect the ability of people to practice their legally mandated fundamental rights. Censorship has mostly been directed towards the media and communication industries, thus limiting the capacity of people to freely express themselves. Moreover, censored content that is broadcasted by the media implies that the public is unable to access the full message. This not only weakness the ability of numerous institutions to deliver the right message to people, but it also curtails the freedom of speech. In the contemporary society, censorship takes many forms and its basic aim is to ensure that people are not able to access the whole or true content of information and ideologies.
There have been numerous debates pertaining to the positive and negative impacts of censorship, but it is evident that pervasive use of force to censor communication systems tends to adversely affect the society. Some individuals argue that censorship helps in creating a balance between what is written and spoken, while critics oppose this action, arguing that it threatens the right to free speech and spread of vital information. Censorship has increasingly been used by political leaders to promote negative ideologies, particularly when it comes to misusing their powers to manipulate what is broadcasted to the public. A good example is when the government uses state-owned media houses to promote the government activities while portraying the ideologies of opposition parties as divisive. Such tendencies usually lead to tensions in the society as political leaders compete for the attention of the people by giving false propaganda.
Furthermore, censorship laws have often been accused of holding people at ransom since they are restricted from expressing their views, opinions, and discussing the issues that affect them. For instance, censorship laws the prohibit discussion of issues such as ethnic and tribal violence, or the prevalence of different kinds of diseases due to poor access to health care. This usually limits the ability of the society to tackle its problems. In such a situation, the public is unable to elaborate on the kind of problems which it is facing, while those in authority restrict the ability of nongovernmental organizations to provide assistance. It is from this perspective that censorship is considered as an instrument that promotes pervasive failure in a society. Another important issue to consider is that when certain information is curtailed from being communicated, it implies that the society will rely on inaccurate information to react against what is being communicated. At the same time, important information will be locked away from being accessed by the public.
Studies have also revealed that censorship tends to reduce the rate of innovation in the society. Evidence suggests that sharing information has played an instrumental role in enhancing development in the society, and this has only been made possible through collaboration. However, censorship limits the ability of the society to access information, especially those that originates from foreign news outlets. This implies that the thoughts and ideologies of other parties, which would have enhanced the success of a domestic community usually go to waste since the government limits access to this crucial information. From the above perspectives, censorship not only hinders the progress of a society, but it also limits its capacity to tackle various forms of challenges. Therefore, it is plausible to make an argument that censorship laws do not have any positive outcomes to the society, and must be banned.